"Come and See": A Web Commentary on the Gospel of John: Section 9 Deepening Conflict (Jn 9.1- 10.42)


Section 9.3 Jesus at the Feast of Dedication (Jn 10.22-39)



COMMENTS ON SPECIFIC VERSES


The Feast of Dedication, or Hanukkah, as it is better known today, lasts for eight days and takes place in November or December according to the Gregorian calendar. It commemorates the purification and rededication of the Jerusalem Temple after the victory of the Maccabees over the forces of the Seleucid kingdom in the early second century BCE. A popular story, committed to writing in the Talmud, recounted that when the Temple was cleansed, only a day's supply of consecrated oil was found to light the menorah (which was required to burn daily from evening to morning before the Lord (Exodus 27.20-1)). Nevertheless, the menorah's lamps were miraculously kept burning until fresh oil could be pressed and consecrated by the high priest, which took eight days. Although Josephus does not recount the miracle of the oil in his Antiquities of the Jews, he refers to Hanukkah as the Feast of Lights and explains: I suppose the reason was, because this liberty beyond our hopes appeared to us; and that thence was the name given to that festival. (Antiquities of the Jews 12.7.7).

Even if the story of the miracle of the oil was not yet widely associated with the holiday in the evangelist's time, it seems likely that the association with light already was. Josephus was after all a younger contemporary of both Jesus and the Elder. Thus we see in chapters 7-10 a unit bracketed at either end with a feast associated with light as well as by common themes of light and darkness, spiritual perception and spiritual blindness, along with Jesus' claims of revelations from the Father and of self-revelation in words and deeds as he does the work of the Father who sent him. In the course of this unit Jesus twice proclaims that he is the Light of the World.

Return to Gospel


Solomon's Portico, or Porch, is one of two places in the Temple named in association with Jesus' preaching in John -- the other is the treasury (Jn 8.20). As the plan shows, the Temple was a rectangular building contained within a square perimeter (shown in the inset plan at the bottom left). This structure was oriented on an east-west axis, with the east to the viewer's right on the plan (so that the Holy of Holies is at the far left, or westmost, side of the plan). The treasury was in the Court of Women, the outermost of the courts from which Gentiles were restricted, while Solomon's Portico was a colonnade along the eastern side of the Temple, outside the Court of Women. It was bounded on the east by the wall of the Temple precinct, which apparently could be entered through a gate known as the Shushan Gate. In winter the wall would have blocked the prevailing east wind and provided an appealing site for those listening to Jesus' teaching.

Return to Gospel


The word "sheep" here links back with the previous teaching from Jesus about shepherds and sheepfolds. The true sheep of v27 presuppose a true shepherd, such as was described earlier in ch10.

Return to Gospel


In this verse Jesus shocks his hearers with the assertion that he and his Father are one. Later in the dialogue, he says (in v37) that the Father is in me and I am in the Father. Taken together the two statements provide a new picture of what "God" means. Jesus and Father are one entity (the Greek word for "one" here is not grammatically masculine, which would indicate "one person", but neuter, indicating "one thing"). Furthermore this condition of oneness is defined both by relationship and inter-relationship. The Son is only a son because he has a Father just as the Father needs a son in order to be a Father. And within this relationship there is an inter-relationship, because the two, Father and Son, indwell with one another, Father in Son and Son in Father. It is this concept of one entity made up of two persons entwined in their relationships of Father to Son and Son to Father that preserves monotheism in John's Gospel. Because of it, Jesus never appears as a second God or claiming such a position. Instead he is part of a single divine Being made up of himself as Son and his Father who sent him. For more discussion of this topic, see Bauckham 2007 pp 250-1.

Return to Gospel

It is at the end of ch8 that a group of Jesus' listeners first takes stones in their hands to throw at him (Jn 8.59). Here they are moved by Jesus' statement that he and the Father are one, which they believe to be blasphemous. After his answer in Jn 5.17 to the charge of healing on the Sabbath, Jesus is said to have been condemned by the authorities in Jn 5.18: So after that the authorities sought rather to kill him, not only because he failed to observe the Sabbath but also he said that God was his own father, making himself equal to God.. However stoning is not explicitly mentioned in chapter 5, so "again" here should be referring to the end of Jn 8. Jesus' statements are of course not blasphemous to one who has correctly understood how what Jesus has already said about his relationship to the Father should be seen as preserving monotheism. However the whole point of this dialogue, and others from previous chapters, is that many of Jesus' interlocutors refuse to understand either his works or what he says about the Father and the Son, for reasons that he identified as culpable spiritual "blindness" in Jn 9.39-41 and further criticised in Jn 10.1-21.

Return to Gospel


The quotation from the Bible here is from the Psalms, and so not technically from the Law; the word "Law" is being used in a broad sense, to refer to the whole canon of Scripture. As before (in Jn 8.17), the use of the possessive "your" seems intended as an ironic comment on these Jerusalemites' presumed devotion to the Law in contrast to their apparent ignorance of the implications of this Psalm in the context of Jesus' life and teaching. It would, I think, be a great strain on the word to interepret it as suggesting a gap between Jesus himself and the Law or Second Temple Judaism. That is, we should understand it to mean "the Law to which you are so attached", not "your Law as opposed to mine".

The argument from Scripture is a little complicated. Part of the problem is in the interpretation of the Psalm itself (Ps 82). What is this about? Who are being addressed in v6, part of which Jesus actually quotes (You are gods)? Many modern commentators on the Psalms seem to agree that Ps 82 and this reference to gods in particular refer to the notion of a heavenly court or throne room in which YHWH presides as the ruler over lesser gods, but that is not a universal interpretation (see Psalms 2: A Commentary on Psalms 51-100 Hermeneia. Frank-Lothar Hossfeld and Erich Zenger, trans and interp; Linda H Maloney, Eng trans; Klaus Baltzer, ed. (Minneapolis 2005) 328-37). If we cannot find a modern consensus concerning those addressed in Ps 82.6, what about a rabbinic one? Did rabbinic interpreters have a standard interpretation? It appears that in fact they had three main interpretations of who were being addressed in Ps 82.6: first, angels in the heavenly court described at the start of the psalm; second, the judges or rulers of Israel (who are being criticised in vv2-4 in terms reminiscent of the prophets); and third the whole people of Israel at Sinai (thought to be alluded to in v5b), where they were first given the Law but then rejected it in the incident of the Golden Calf. Whichever of these readings is the one Jesus and his hearers brought to Ps 82.6, the point of Jesus' argument remains the same, and relies upon the midrashic principle of qal wahomer (arguing or inferring from the lesser to the greater). So it runs in this way: If in Scripture God addresses beings, whether angels or human beings, with the statement, "You are gods" then, since Scripture cannot be made invalid, how can you accuse the one whom the Father had consecrated and sent into the world (Jn 10.36) of blasphemy when I call myself "son of God"? Clearly the Scriptures themselves didn't blaspheme when they referred to angels/human beings as "gods" in the Psalm, because that would constitute annulling Scripture. So it cannot be blasphemy for Jesus, who as the one consecrated and sent into the world by the Father is therefore greater than either angels or people, to call himself "son of God". (See Lincoln pp 307-9 and Carson pp 396-99 for further discussion of this verse.)

Return to Gospel


Here the same verb ("hagiazein") is used to refer to Jesus as is used to describe the consecration of the Tent (also know as the Tabernacle) and its altar in the book of Numbers. There it is said first of the Tent and its appurtenances and then of the altar and its appurtenances that Moses anointed them and then consecrated them. We have already seen in the Prologue that there is a sense in which Jesus takes over the role of the Tent as the place in which the Lord's Presence is made manifest to human beings. That Jesus describes himself as consecrated when speaking during the feast that celebrated the Dedication of the Temple seems intended to remind us of what the Prologue had said. For more discussion, see Brown 1966 pp 402, 404, and 411.

Return to Gospel


The theme of witness is a repeated one in this gospel. It begins with the first chapter, where John the Baptist is shown again and again to have been a witness to who Jesus is. It is mentioned prominently in chapter 3, in the dialogue with Nicodemos and later in John's reaction to Jesus' successful ministry. But in chapter 5 the emphasis switches from a human witness (John the Baptist) to the witness of Jesus's deeds, the works he does, works that the Father has given him to do. The intervening chapters, from 6 to 9, are full of accounts of such works. Here in chapter 10 Jesus begins again to cite his works as witness in arguments and discussions with his opponents, making it clear that those who refuse to take these works into account are unable to realise who he is or to put their trust in him, the precondition for becoming one of his sheep. Thus they reject what Jesus says about himself throughout this section of the text, even going so far as to threaten to stone or arrest him.

Return to Gospel

Return to the opening menu.